All of that being said, nuclear power is still something that needs the utmost in care and attention when it comes to the details. The consequences are beyond dire when things do go wrong. Many things have been learned in the history of these nuclear incidents, and most countries utilizing nuclear power have such extensive oversight that nuclear power is likely very safe. Many people arent convinced though, at least when it comes to the current types of reactors being used. Many people still think that no matter the level of oversight and safety being employed, the risk is too great. So are there any future technologies out there that would mitigate this risk? What future designs can increase safety, and maybe even help solve other problems affecting nuclear power.
One possibility for the future is actually a technology that was initially introduced over fifty years ago, called molten salt reactors, or MSRs. MSRs are starting to gain attention again, as newer technologies may be able to solve some of the problems that initially plagued the idea when it was first introduced. According to an article in the Progress in Nuclear Energy journal entitled "The Molten Salt Reactor (MSR) in Generation IV: Overview and Perspectives," there are several potential advantages to the MSR design. Among those advantages are the fact that MSRs can actually use spent fuel from other nuclear power plants as their primary fuel. Due to their design, they can extract a significantly higher amount of energy from the fuel than the current pressurized water reactor designs currently in use. The article also states that MSRs generate much lower levels of nuclear by product than do current designs, leaving us with a much smaller waste problem, and in fact making use of the world's currently stockpiled spent fuel. Most importantly, the article points out the significant safety aspects of MSR designs. MSR reactors, due to their design, inherently will not meltdown, and indeed are self regulating. They need power put into them in order to sustain a nuclear reaction. In a worst-case scenario where all power was cut to the reactor, simple and full-proof mechanisms ensure that the reactor simply shuts down.
An article by the International Atomic Energy Agency summarizes the advantages of the MSR design in much the same way. The IAEA describes the MSR design as being highly efficient in power production, while generating less high-level nuclear waste. They also agree that MSRs can utilize already existing nuclear waste fuel as their own fuel, and that they offer a level of inherent safety not seen with today's commonly used reactor designs. Below is a basic diagram of the MSR design:
Below is a picture of an actual experimental MSR that was developed in the 1960s at Oak Ridge National Laboratory in Tennessee:
Work Cited
Serp, Jerome, et. Al. “The Molten Salt Reactor (MSR) in Generation IV: Overview and Perspectives.” Progress in Nuclear Energy 77 (2014) pp. 308-319. Accessed on 10 Apr. 2017.
Hi, Andy,
ReplyDeleteI think your post is very cognitive to me and I did not know anything about MSR before reading. I agree with you that disasters with nuclear plants could be prevented. But there is always a human factor and something unforeseen can happen. So, I think, before starting of these projects, scientists must be confident in safety more than 100%. Also, I have some questions about MSR: Was MSP in Generation 4 already used somewhere in real life? Can be this model only a test version of the reactor? The article in your post asserts that MSR is a safe model of reactor. Did they check the safety in practice? What will happen with MRS in the case of a directed attack such as a terrorist attack? MSP in Generation 4 will have nuclear wastes. How will these wastes be disposed of?
This was one of the most fascinating blog posts yet. I really found the MSR concept to really spark my interest. You mentioned that it first came about fifty years ago, but had inherent problems. What were those problems? I mean, based on this post, MSR’s seem to be the answer to end all questions. They use the spent fuel, which would lessen the waste issue. They effectively all but eliminate a reactor meltdown. I guess the new question that this generates for me is; Are they working on implementing this technology? If so, how far out is it? I do agree with what seems to be where your conclusion might be headed. That being, that nuclear energy is safe; what we need to work on is better regulatory requirements to help alleviate the human error factor.
ReplyDelete